Archive for February, 2007

Coal Power Plants Whomped

Monday, February 26th, 2007

$45 billion take-over deals are not the usual beat on this site. However, the buy-out offer for TXU, an enormous Texas power utility, by a consortium of private investors is more than just another story of billionaires being billionaires. There is actually some good news to report.

Some time ago TXU announced plans for 11 new coal-fired power plants in Texas. They were going to be new, but new in steel and concrete only. The technology was going to be old, which is to say, cheaper — since free market economies are not much interested in true costs. The CO2 released to the atmosphere by these plants would double TXU’s already high contribution, but heck, this cost is not on TXU’s balance sheet so release away.

Environmental Defense, a 500,000 member environmental advocacy organization, along with many others including mayors and other officials of Texas cities mounted a vociferous campaign to stop the plans. The stock price of TXU dropped over 20% because of the controversy.

The big surprise then, accompanying the proposed sale, is that the potential investors wanted to end this PR war and called up ED to say they were willing to cut back on the power plants. After weeks of negotiations a deal was struck: not 11 new plants, but only three. That is, if adhered to, a major victory. Fred Krupp, president of Environmental Defense has this to say:

As part of the sale agreement, Environmental Defense helped negotiate an aggressive environmental platform that will, among other things:

* Terminate plans for the construction of 8 of 11 coal-fired power plants TXU had hoped to build;
* Stop TXU’s plans to expand coal operations in other states;
* Endorse the U.S. Climate Action Partnership (USCAP) platform, including the call for a mandatory federal cap on carbon emissions; and
* Reduce the company’s carbon dioxide emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.

Besides the victories enumerated above we can take heart that ED and others are now considered players in the biggest arenas — where the truly momentous decisions must be made in the next decade. They are players because they assembled serious teams, got serious money and volunteers and raised the issues in ways that could not be ignored. Then they fielded negotiators able to compete with sharks of high finance.

It helped that the chief buy-out advisors to the group was Goldman Sachs, the enormous Investment Banking firm, which has had a strong position on reducing carbon emissions. Andrew Sorkin at the NY Times has a pretty thorough run-down on the unusual events.

Besides Environmental Defense, the National Resources Defense Council was in on the negotiations. They’re pretty happy, as well.

Is this the end of the story? Not by a long shot. You’ll see at the end of Sorkin’s article that some of city and municipal officials in on the fight may in fact continue to contest the three plants left on the board.

There are all sorts of other issues at work here, too. We can be sure that the new owners — if the deal goes through — got a great deal of what they wanted, much of which many readers here will want to scream about. It may well happen that hidden clauses pop up in the years ahead to make the good guys bang their heads on the wall. But for all that, let’s call it a victory, a leg to stand on, a flag to wave in the battles ahead — not the least of which is to get a core group of rich bastards to understand it’s about investing in the real world, not the fantasy one they’ve been living in since the beginning of the industrial age. It’s about their children and grandchildren too, and the world they will have, which won’t be much of one if reduced to gated communities, with over extended resource supply lines, defended by armies of mercenaries.

Congratulations, and keep the sentries alert.

Climate Change Education

Monday, February 26th, 2007

Sweet it was to see Inconvenient Truth walk off with a couple of Oscars last night, and to hear the impassioned, succinct acceptance speeches.

As you may know the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) recently turned down 50,000 free copies of the film, stating it would constitute a “product endorsement.”

Jeff Masters, one of the bloggers we depend on for weather and climate related issues, points out, referring to realclimate.org, that NSTA depends heavily on Exxon Mobile for funding, as does the American Enterprise Institute.

AEI has recently been in the news for agressively soliciting (offering $10,000) views contrary to the just released climate change report by the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC), under the auspices of the U.N. Interestingly, the NSTA has on its list of recommended readings “Global Warming: Understanding the Debate”, by Kenneth Green, a fellow of the AEI. Doubly interesting, the letters of $10,000 solicitations for solid-science debunkers was sent by the same Mr. Green. One wonders what science is in the book being recommended by association of science teachers.

By bringing this up Masters isn’t promoting “Inconvenient Truth.” In fact he says it is too politicized for best science teaching, though he likes it as a capable rendition of science for the general public. He does offer a couple of suggestions aimed at the Jr. and Sr. High levels — neither of which appear on the NSTA recommended list. So, if you know science teachers, pass these on to them:

“The two best books for teaching about climate change are missing from the NSTA’s recommendations: Robert Henson’s excellent Rough Guide to Climate Change (high school level) and The North Pole Was Here (grades 6-9), by New York Times climate change writer Andrew Revkin.”

Update: Juan Cole, our go-to guy for information from Iraq and much of the Middle East, weighs in on the Oscar occassion, and the AEI-Exxon Mobile Nexus.

We know that Exxon Mobil is a significant funder of the American Enterprise Institute and has used it to attempt to bribe “scientists” to cast doubt on global warming. Lee Raymond, who was CEO of Exxon Mobil until 2005, is the vice-chair of AEI’s board of directors.

We also know that the American Enterprise Institute is the most hawkish of the Washington “think tanks,” and that its staffers were key to thinking up and promoting the Iraq War with lies and propaganda.

A=B, B=C, therefore A=C. Exxon Mobil is a big behind the scenes player in the Iraq War by virtue of its support for AEI. In fact, I think a boycott of its gas stations is in order until the company cuts off AEI and stops promoting the Iraq War and muddying the waters on global warming. (It pledged to do the latter in the past, but obviously was lying).

Juan Cole

Presidential Slush Fund for Terror

Sunday, February 25th, 2007

Update: Here is the Sy Hersh article being talked about.

Here are links to Tristero [look for "Thus, The Gates Of Hell" the article-link seems broken] and Digby [look for "Rube Goldberg Policy Contraption" the article-link seems broken] talking about the article.
*
Crooks And Liars catches a scary interview Blitzer on CNN has with Sy Hersh. It is scary in many respects:

that the brain trust in the Administration has decided to tilt Sunni (and thus, al-Qaeda, and Sunni killers of US troops in Iraq) against Shiia (read Iran);

that a special planning group has been established in the offices of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, charged with creating a contingency bombing plan for Iran that can be implemented, upon orders from the President, within twenty-four hours;

that there is all kind of money washing through the middle east, the source of which is the US government, being used for covert ops, unauthorized by anyone other than the president’s henchmen;

that John Negroponte’s decision to step down as Intelligence Chief and become a Deputy Secretary of State was in part because he opposed these under the counter dealings; Negroponte was too ethical!

…we have been pumping money, a great deal of money, without congressional authority, without any congressional oversight, Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia is putting up some of this money, for covert operations in many areas of the Middle East where we think that the — we want to stop the Shiite spread or the Shiite influence.

…So America, my country, without telling Congress, using funds not appropriated, I don’t know where, by my sources believe much of the money obviously came from Iraq where there is all kinds of piles of loose money, pools of cash that could be used for covert operations.

All of this should be investigated by Congress, by the way, and I trust it will be. In my talking to membership — members there, they are very upset that they know nothing about this. And they have great many suspicions.

We are simply in a situation where this president is really taking his notion of executive privilege to the absolute limit here, running covert operations, using money that was not authorized by Congress, supporting groups indirectly that are involved with the same people that did 9/11, and we should be arresting these people rather than looking the other way…

Awash in Cash

Officer Against the War

Sunday, February 25th, 2007

A Soldier’s Declaration

I am making this statement as an act of willful defiance of military authority, because I believe the war is being deliberately prolonged by those who have the power to end it.

I am a soldier, convinced that I am acting on behalf of soldiers. I believe that this war, upon which I entered as a war of defence and liberation has now become a war of aggression and conquest. I believe that the purposes for which I and my fellow soldiers entered upon this war should have been so clearly stated as to have made it impossible to change them, and that, had this been done, the objects witch actuated us would now be attainable by negotiation.

I have seen and endured the suffering of the troops, and I can no longer be a party to prolong these sufferings for ends which I believe to be evil and unjust. I am not protesting against the conduct of the war, but against the political errors and insincerity’s for which the fighting men are being sacrificed.

On behalf of those who are suffering now I make this protest against the deception which is being practised on them; also I believe that I may help to destroy the callous complacence with which the majority of those at home regard the continuance of agonies which they do not share, and which they have not sufficient imagination to realise.
(more…)

Cluster Bombs: Good!

Saturday, February 24th, 2007

Cluster bombs. If only they could be teletransported into the neighborhoods of those who think they are such great weapons….

Cluster Bombs

46 of 49 countries attending an Oslo conference on banning cluster bombs agreed to push forward with a declaration against the evil little toys. The US didn’t even attend, nor did Russia, China or Israel — the new axis of the deranged.

Cluster Bomb Treaty Hopes

Clinton Fires on Own

Thursday, February 22nd, 2007

The question we keep asking of Senator Clinton is not, “Do you regret your 2002 Bush enabling vote?” but “What are you doing now? How are you showing us, as a Senator and as a declared candidate, your ideas and your mettle?”

Sad to say the answer keeps rolling in bad.

The political gossip sheets have been party-gown sequined with news of the Clinton/Wolfson duo trying to tar Obama with David Geffen’s public put-down of Hillary and Bill.

Geffen was once a big fan of the Clinton’s — a fundraiser and visitor to the White House. After Clinton pardoned Marc Rich and not Leonard Peltier (as urged by Geffen) the friendship went sour. Last week Geffen held a $1.3 million fundraiser for Obama and at it gave Maureen Dowd some juicy opinion of the Clintons — which the Arch Cat put in her column on Sunday. H. Clinton went ballistic and sic’d Howard Wolfson on Obama.

The fight went public pretty quickly, and again, here and Margaret Carlson here.

Arianna jumps right in with unkind words for Wolfson.

James Carville and Donna Brazile strike out against Geffen while on the Situation Room.

Eric Alterman is tongue tied at the inanity of the thing but thinks Camp Clinton saw an opportunity to serve up some shit to reporters they could not resist.

Eric Boehlert at Media Matters lets Dowd have it with a few fact checks.

Somerby, at the Daily Howler, doesn’t like any of what he’s seeing, reminding us that Arianna not too long ago was calling Al Gore a serial liar and now she thinks he’s fabulous; today she’s lauding Geffen’s description of the Clinton’s a great liars…

And somewhere in the melee the dispicable Dick Morris weighs in, once a friend now a foe of everything Clinton.

Oh what a pie fight! If only it were only that. From what I read Clinton’s crew is too ugly, too fast. Take on the enemy please, not those standing in your own circle.

Gas Attacks

Thursday, February 22nd, 2007

The news of the last few days that certain Iraqi squads have taken to blowing up trucks filled with chlorine - to add gas to the horrors of their attacks on others — scratched a match on a poem that has been with me for years and it blew up, again, in my brain.
*

Dulce Et Decorum Est

By Wilfred Owen

Bent double, like old beggars under sacks,
Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through sludge,
Till on the haunting flares we turned our backs
And towards our distant rest began to trudge.
Men marched asleep. Many had lost their boots
But limped on, blood-shod. All went lame; all blind;
Drunk with fatigue; deaf even to the hoots
Of disappointed shells that dropped behind.

GAS! Gas! Quick, boys!– An ecstasy of fumbling,
Fitting the clumsy helmets just in time;
But someone still was yelling out and stumbling
And floundering like a man in fire or lime.–
Dim, through the misty panes and thick green light
As under a green sea, I saw him drowning.
(more…)

Natural Resources

Thursday, February 22nd, 2007
Natural Resources
How Rich Will We Be When We Have Converted All Our Forest, All Our Soil, All Our Water Resources and Minerals to Cash?
1938, “Ding” Darling

I had the good fortune to have my neurons grow a bit last week when I visited the “Ding” Darling National Wildlife Refuge on Sanibel Island, Florida.

Like a lot of us I fall too often into the error of thinking that life began with me, that war loathing, habitat protecting, and protesting the powerful are things I, and those close to me, have a claim to unknown in the history of mankind. Fortunately, we are easily disabused of such singular ideas. We read John Muir, we admire Virginia Woolf’s anti-war writing. we draw lessons from the anti-slavery organizers. Still, to find that a man, a cartoonist, with a name like “Ding” was talking in the 1930s about habitat destruction and the consequences for the world, in language that hasn’t changed much to this day, was an eye-opener. And that he kept churning out his editorial cartoons — some 15,000 of them– and converted his opinion to persuasion and action reminds me of the power of not giving up. The work he and other unknown people did in those years putting trees, water, animals, human behavior into the national dialog has provided the foundation we work from today.

More of Ding’s cartoons here.

Terrorists in Iran

Wednesday, February 14th, 2007

“Eighteen people have been killed when a car bomb ripped through a bus carrying members of Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards in a sensitive southeastern border province.”

Raw Story

The attack was in Zahedan, very close to the Pakistan border and not too far from Afghanistan.

“Zahedan is the capital of Sistan-Baluchestan province which borders both Afghanistan and Pakistan and has been hit by a string of attacks and kidnappings blamed on a Sunni group called Jundallah (Allah’s Brigade).

The province has a substantial Baluch community, a minority Sunni Muslim group. ”

Is there a word like nostalgia that means fearful, instead of pleasant, memories? I have it for CIA supplying anti Russian clans in Afghanistan…

It’s Hard to Make Small Talk Today

Saturday, February 10th, 2007

By Will Kirkland, 2004

It is hard to make small talk today.
Everything is so huge.

A child has died in Falluja.
A bullet wound the size of brains
has taken him. His mother now prepares
for thirty years of grief, a euphemism
for what her womb will bear, a memory
of what she saw: infanticide by error. The sniper wipes
his burning eye and prays to find
through dust and fear another, better enemy,
swears to christ he will not die
in god’s forsaken alley, squeezing
off another round, another and
another.

Until the infant’s uncle
detonates himself, and him,
to find their separate heavens.

These are all the things I see.

The words descend through space,
Like birds
           on bullet shredded wings;
struggle to be lifted
against the roaring air
exhale and fail. Such tiny, unremembered deaths
in the human scheme of things.

Don’t talk to me. For just another second;
Give my soul its mourning moment
to pack another coffin home.

*
*
*
*
*

Now I, along with all of you, can go,
taken each with our own pain:
A broken toy, a phone call missed;
A headache in the evening.

We talk of little else:
The rising price of gasoline;
How hot it is –too hot to shop,
the pinching shoes.

Are the vegetables organic?

Will the Red Sox lose?

Conversations in the wind,
the words, the wingless birds, the
body parts, come down like rain
a drip, a crawl upon my skin.

Questions of tomorrow come
Drop like ashes on the drums.

Who will pick the children up?
Who will who when what the how if?
Laughter slaps, then slips
and ricochets away.

The goldfinch in the garden
drops a seed, a shadow shimmers overhead,
Goldfinch gone but first it keens.
And we?
          Only whistling in the wind…

Will Kirkland

2004

Iran: US Naval Maneuvers

Friday, February 9th, 2007

This article linked to below is a fairly comprehensive look at the US Naval deployments into, or potentially into, the Arabian Sea. The author, Paul Rogers, doesn’t mention the USS Truman (CVN 75) which is already undergoing shakedown cruises in the Atlantic preparatory for an April deployment to relieve the USS Eisenhower. He does speculate that the USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) , slated into the Philippines at the end of February, is actually in a position to make a run to the Arabian Sea. Yes, but. The distance between Subic Bay, Philippines and Dahar, Qatar is 5,000 mi. At 30 knots, 24 hours a day it would take the task force 7 days to make the trip. Not in time to be an overnight surprise but certainly possible — if North Korea can be prevailed upon to not take advantage of the absence, or if the Kitty Hawk really can be pulled out of upkeep in Japan in two or three days and re-take up its West Pacific duties.

The Persian Gulf: a war of position
Paul Rogers for OpenDemocracy.net

The logistics of the United States military build-up off Iran’s coast are ominous.

Even not counting the Truman or the Reagan the force in the Arabian Sea is already formidable: two major carriers, the Stennis and the Eisenhower, and their supporting guided missile cruisers and destroyers and two amphibious assault ships –carrier looking ships but chiefly for helicopter debarkation of supplies, weapons and marines — the Boxer and the Bataan, along with their support vessels

Stratfor, a business intelligence group, has further analysis of the ship movements.

It strikes me that, along with all the praise to the Dems for the hearings underway, every elected official in Washington should be pushed to be pushing back as hard as they can against any war whoops, attack sleight-of-hand, moussed up charges against Iran, dire warnings about Islamofascism and immient danger to the US, etc.

We alread know about the Bushes: Where there’s a way, there’s a will. The heavy guns are almost in position; all it will take is a collision at sea to set off a second major war.

Revenge: A Poem

Friday, February 9th, 2007

By Taha Muhammad Ali


Revenge
At times … I wish
I could meet in a duel
the man who killed my father
and razed our home,
expelling me
into a narrow country.
And if he killed me,
I’d rest at last
and if I were ready -
I would take my revenge!

(more…)

Letters From Iwo Jima

Thursday, February 8th, 2007

I saw Letters from Iwo Jima last night. I liked it. Is it a great film? No. Is it a brave film? Yes.

In a sort of Nixon-to-China move Eastwood, the great American paragon of celebratory violence, goes to the heart of the Japanese enemy and finds men pretty much like the American men they are fighting: fighting for god and country; writing letters home, getting letters from worried mothers with news about stray dogs; men with memories of wives and infants. The Japanese are not quite elevated to the stature of the Americans: there are no thrilling charges over-running American emplacements; the deaths we see are almost all of Japanese, shot, incinerated, blown up, gruesomely self immolated with their own grenades. The faux black and white of the film shot on the volcanic island, at night, in the dark heat of the caves brings us the grinding, terrible contrary of the glory of war. In his reflective older years Eastwood knows: war is brutal on every side. He has an American soldier shoot at point blank range two prisoners he is guarding. He shows the Japanese taking that in and redoubling their resolve to fight unto death. Though not as fully drawn as his characters in Million Dollar Baby, his Japanese officers and men have range and contradiction, a mixed lot — brave and cowardly, even-handed and vicious, funny and stern. We follow three of them in the time-compressed claustrophobia of the caves, preparing for, and fighting, a battle they knew from the beginning they were almost sure to lose. This sense of doom and the conflicting swirl of human courage and fear is the emotional thematic of the film. Though there are plenty of battle scenes — and fine computer renditions of the US fleet stunning the waiting Japanese with its size and power — they don’t overwhelm the human story Eastwood is interested in. If only more of the trigger-happy crowd could share in his maturing vision. Though given the vicious attacks for being a euthanasiast for the final scenes in Million Dollar Baby, it won’t be long before he is forced through the right wing gauntlet for being a “Jap lover.”

[As you no doubt know the film is an Oscar nominee and pairs with his earlier film, Flag of Our Fathers, about the Americans in the battle. The battle for Iwo Jima was a brutal two month cave to cave fight made particularly famous by the iconic image of US soliders raising a large American flag on Mt Suribachi early in the fighting. Some 18,000 Japanese died, and nearly 7,000 Americans. One third of all US Marine deaths of WW II happend in these few weeks on this small island.]

Danger in the Country

Tuesday, February 6th, 2007

Much too busy these days; being distracted by things that matter from things that matter.

On the island of Floreana, one of the Galapagos group, in 1939, a family of Germans — the Wittmers — lived. They had come in 1932 and in 7 years had created a family of five and a small sustainable farm and home. Everything they needed they created or grew, picked or slaughtered. Not liking what little they knew of Hitler they nevertheless were Germans and were worried about country, their parents and siblings under the bombs in Cologne and in London. And yet their lives were spent, day in and day out, in making –literally– their living, Margret the author of her memoir titled Floreana, making soap out of animal fat, Rolf the five year old herding and fishing, Heinz the father digging and cultivating and hunting. The news, and their fears, arrived irregularly with drops of accumulated letters and newspapers from passing ships or aircraft.

I feel like Margert Wittmeyer from time to time; perhaps we all do — living, in many respects, on our own individual islands far from mainstream America, not enthralled or caught up in television or catalog sales or weekends at the mall, and feeling that this country we love and friends, acquaintances and family are living close to danger, if not imminent at least proximate, feeling like we could or should be doing something, or something more, to pull the country back from the brink, or at least help people escape, yet pressed so hard by the necessary that we don’t have enough time, or energy, or wealth, to act beyond our own short reach. We know the danger threatening our wider families and yet we turn our attention to the matters near to hand. The Wittmers were lucky: the war did not take their children; the bombs in Europe only made their families homeless, not cadavers. No one, of course, likes the current odds.

CO Court Martial Begins

Monday, February 5th, 2007

First officer to be court-martialed for refusing to deploy to Iraq, Lt. Ehrn Watada. If you’re going up to Washington this week stop by Ft. Lewis and show a little solidarity.

Courage to Resist

You have no idea what kind of guts it takes to do what he has done. I do. I was in his shoes many years ago. Facing another deployment to Vietnam I said no. Actually I said: I will obey orders but I will give none. My superiors sluiced me out the back door instead of standing me up to take the heat and set example. Watada is being asked much more of. He doesn’t need a lot of back slapping or tears of homage, just recognition that he has stood up like we ask our young soldiers to do, and fought for something vitally important to all of us — the very heart of our democracy. We will not obey unlawful orders. We, proudly, will not obey.

Court-Martial Begins for War Objector

Oil: Grow Some?

Monday, February 5th, 2007

You may or may not know this, but oil does not come from long decayed dinosaurs — though it once did come from almost every last whale on earth. It came, mostly, from algae — billions of tons of the stuff, brewed up in shallow, tropical, heat warmed seas and sunk, and compressed and decayed and stored away with its load of CO2 forever, until Manling waved his magic wand and started sucking it out of the great beds and burning it, releasing the CO2 back into the atmosphere.

So what about using algae again, only not waiting for the million year compression cycle? Grow it, refine it, burn it, grow it, refine it…. How does this help? Algae, grown today, will suck CO2 out of the air; burned tomorrow it will release it back; grow some more, get some more, etc. How it helps is that it lessens, or stops, release of CO2 that’s been in the vaults for all these eons, only releasing what was captured yesterday. Like catch and release fishing.

Not a few start-up companies are beginning to bet significant dollars that there is something in this dream.

Raw algae can be processed to make biocrude, the renewable equivalent of petroleum, and refined to make gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, and chemical feedstocks for plastics and drugs. Indeed, it can be processed at existing oil refineries to make just about anything that can be made from crude oil.

Algae Crude

Even from MIT this article seems a little bouyant, frothy as it were. The first obvious question is what forseeable events might be generated by man-made algae fields the size of Florida? What does genetic engineering do to algae in the wild — destructive to fish and other water creatures in certain doses? What if, what if? Of course we may have to do a deal with the devil sooner rather than later, just to keep the unimaginable that way. But if so, let’s get our eyes and brains as wide open as possible beforehand.

Oil: The Great Satan

Monday, February 5th, 2007

I mentioned last week that friends and I had gone to see Dan Hoyle’s astounding one-man show at the Marsh Theatre in San Francico: Tings Dey Happen. (It’s been extended. Catch yourself an eye opener.)

Hoyle was in Nigeria for 10 months on a Fullbright and brought back what he saw and heard. Others have been there, too.

Oil fouls everything in southern Nigeria. It spills from the pipelines, poisoning soil and water. It stains the hands of politicians and generals, who siphon off its profits. It taints the ambitions of the young, who will try anything to scoop up a share of the liquid riches—fire a gun, sabotage a pipeline, kidnap a foreigner.

Nigeria had all the makings of an uplifting tale: poor African nation blessed with enormous sudden wealth. Visions of prosperity rose with the same force as the oil that first gushed from the Niger Delta’s marshy ground in 1956. The world market craved delta crude, a “sweet,” low-sulfur liquid called Bonny Light, easily refined into gasoline and diesel. By the mid-1970s, Nigeria had joined OPEC (Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries), and the government’s budget bulged with petrodollars.

Everything looked possible—but everything went wrong.

National Geographic: Nigeria

[thx Harry H.]

Iraq: How Many Troops?

Monday, February 5th, 2007

So we’ve all gotten used to the idea of 140,000 troops in Iraq, and that Mr. Bush is going to splurge another 21,500 or so (actually, it turns out, about 35,000 since the 21,500 are combat troops and need a bit of support.) We know that the numbers of dead US military is about 3,100. If you’re really paying attention you might know there are over 47,000 non-mortal US casualties — from lacertions needing a sterile bandage to limbs and brain parts blown away.

Of course, per usual, this is not the whole story. Appearing from time to time, and last night from the mouth of Ted Kopple at NPR is the figure 100,000. They would be 100,000 contractors. Not military — though in large part ex military — doing much of the work the military did, in Vietnam for example: cooking, truck-driving, riding shotgun for the truck drivers, protection of the high and mighty. You name it they do it. AND, they are not being counted in troop size or in US casualties.

With at least 100,000 civilian contractors from the United States and elsewhere performing reconstruction and security duties in Iraq, the U.S. Senate’s current debate over troop levels has focused on only one part of America’s involvement in Iraq.

And this is from Ted Koppel who has, at other times, lauded the use of these contractors on the battle field.

Divine Right: Reasserted

Thursday, February 1st, 2007

In the 6th District Court of Appeals (Cincinnati) where Judge Anna Diggs Taylor’s ruling that the Bush Administration broke the law with its unwarranted surveillance of hundreds of people, the government is trying out the divine right of secrecy argument: whether the surveillance was illegal cannot be answered without disclosing state secrets. Full stop.

US Eavesdropping

Further, it is being asserted that those who believe they were spied on “have no standing” to bring the case; that the damage they suffered is vague and speculative. No standing, no suit. Of course the question then arises: who has standing — to argue that the consitution is being destroyed?

One’s mind turns to the Congress which is flexing its biceps recently but is far from being the full co-equal master of the house the founders envisioned.

Perhaps John Conyer’s proposed investigation into Bush’s signing statements begin the process of becoming the check and balance to executive authority we’ve long been missing.