Archive for the ‘Books’ Category

Ahab and the Gulf

Sunday, June 13th, 2010

Anyone who’s been around me these last weeks will testify to my mini obsession with what Moby Dick has to tell us about the Great Gulf Oil Vomiting of 2010. I’ve been listening daily to an audible telling of the great novel, all 136 chapters, available at Lit2Go from the University of South Florida (via iTunes.) In fact, the Pequod and all its crew but Ishmael, went to the bottom as I pulled into the garage this Friday. I sat of course, for a while, feeling the pressure of the watery grave. I’ve come to think that listening to the story, with all its erudite meanderings into amateur science, has been roping it into my dendrites much tighter than my former readings did. Perhaps it’s my age, or the year of this “reading.” But I get it now, more than I ever have.

They key point of comparison between the whale hunters and the oil hunters is that both, in their time, were the energy industry. Though wood and peat burning certainly provided warmth around the world, and coal had been mined since the time of the Romans there was nothing to compare to whale oil, especially sperm whale oil which didn’t smell as bad as right whale oil, for illumination, or for lubrication. As the whale population declined from voracious hunting, expeditions of 3 years and more as described in Moby Dick became the norm. Let’s call it far off-shore whaling. The essence of whaling was to pierce the animal with several sharp instruments — harpoons and lances– and bring the carcass alongside and extract the oil — from the blubber by refining it, and the precious spermacetti directly from the head. Call it sweet and heavy crude. The story of Moby Dick is, in a thimble full, the story of obsession, man’s drive to dominate, indeed revenge itself, against nature, and nature’s revenge against the world — the world of course being the Pequod with sailors and harpooners from every corner of earth.

It all seems impossibly predictive of what we see happening in the Gulf. Greed is more the driver than revenge, but domination of nature is still the mental set of those who have gone further and further off shore, to drive their deep drills into the earth to extract the precious stuff.

I’d been turning over a mid-sized essay to contemplate all this when lo and behold a pretty decent one appeared as the lead story in this Sunday’s NY Times, Week in Review. Randy Kennedy starts off:

“A quenchless thirst for whale oil, then petroleum, pushed man ever farther and deeper. And with great hubris, great risk.”

and continues:

A specially outfitted ship ventures into deep ocean waters in search of oil, increasingly difficult to find. Lines of authority aboard the ship become tangled. Ambition outstrips ability. The unpredictable forces of nature rear up, and death and destruction follow in their wake. “Some fell flat on their faces,” an eyewitness reported of the stricken crew. “Through the breach, they heard the waters pour.”

The words could well have been spoken by a survivor of the doomed oil rig Deepwater Horizon, which exploded in the Gulf of Mexico in April, killing 11 men and leading to the largest oil spill in United States history. But they come instead, of course, from that wordy, wayward Manhattanite we know as Ishmael, whose own doomed vessel, the whaler Pequod, sailed only through the pages of “Moby-Dick.”

“Now small fowls flew screaming over the yet yawning gulf; a sullen white surf beat against its steep sides; then all collapsed, and the great shroud of the sea rolled on as it rolled five thousand years ago.” — “Moby-Dick”

So I’m glad to recommend to you Kennedy’s piece. More judicious and less emotive than I might have been, nevertheless it’s worth remembering that man’s war against nature has been recognized for quite some while as a war that will not be won by the puny two legged creature, no matter how long his lances.

Beijing Coma: A Novel

Monday, May 24th, 2010

Mainland China is an enormous country. With 9.6 million square kilometers it is the third largest country in the world  after Russia and Canada. The 1.33 billion population is the world’s largest, ahead of India by 1.5 million and the U.S. by over 4 times. There are some 56 ethnic populations recognized by the government, many of whom, even if speaking the national language, Mandarin, are often scarcely intelligible to one another. From the Xinhai revolution in 1911 through the Tiananmen Square massacres in 1989 the country has gone through successive waves of convulsion. To outsiders the May Fourth Movement of 1919, is hardly known. The alliance between the Communist Party and the Kuomintang against the regional warlords in the 1920s, the subsequent campaigns pitting Communists against  Nationalists, followed by their united front against 14 years of Japanese occupation, and return to war against each other have little exposure in the West, except among historians.

Mao’s Great Leap forward (also called the Great Chinese Famine) from 1958 to 1961 is said to have cost 36 million lives. It still may not be written or spoken of on the mainland.  Though many studies have appeared in scholarly books and journals outside of China only in 2008 did the definitive historical work appear, not yet in English translation.  But history and documentation, however vital, are necessarily views from the outside, concerned with getting objective facts compiled and in order.  To understand the actual, breathing humans who undergo such events, we almost always depend on fiction and to a lesser extent, memoirs.  These have been in woefully short supply from China.  Only slowly are novels and short-stories being written, and then, sporadically making their way into western markets and to the reading public.  Life and Death Are Wearing Me Out, in 2006, by Mo Yan, translated by the acclaimed Howard Goldblatt in 2008, and To Live, 1993, by Yu Hua, translated by Michael Berry in 2003 are both powerful, human tours through the years of the war and the great famine.

The Cultural Revolution got more press attention in the West during the time of its unfolding,  1966 – 1976 (depending on what marks the end-point) than the preceding wars and famine,  though there were large ideological filters on what was available.  Fictional treatments did appear more quickly following the Cultural Revolution than following the Great Famine and more have become more widely  available in translation.  We even have a commercial book titled Chinese Fiction of the Cultural Revolution, already translated, and with an annotated bibliography. Many readers have read and enjoyed Dai Sijie’s, 2000,  Balzac and the Little Chinese Seamstress translated from the French in 2001.   Gao Xingjian won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 2000.  His most recent translated novel, One Man’s Bible, 1999, translated by Mabel Lee,  deals more richly with the Cultural Revolution than his 1990, Soul Mountain.  Both have won a wide readership.

The event that may have marked the end of these terrible decades of privation, civil war, mutual massacre –and yes, cannibalism –  riveted both China and the west in June of 1989.  It has come to be known in the west as the Tiananmen Square Massacre.  The Chinese government naturally enough, prefers something more innocuous, like the June Fourth Incident.  The events of the days leading up to June 4, when the tanks rolled in and “the Tankman” achieved instant fame by standing in front of the lead tank, a frail human body against a line of tanks, were well chronicled –as well as at-the-moment reporting can do.  It has also been documented extensively in academic papers and books for professional readers. Most impressively for the general reader we now have a first rate fictional treatment not just of the few days the world saw, but of the weeks, months and even years leading up to what young Chinese men and women saw as the Chinese Democracy Movement and the hours that brought it to an end.

Beijing Coma, by Ma Jian, (2008, translation by Flora Drew, 2008)  is not yet a War and Peace, though there are elements of the great novel in it.  The focus is much narrower in time, and in numbers and social strata of the  participants, though it is much more detailed as to their movements and thoughts during the time witnessed.  The narrator, Dai Wei is, throughout the novel, in a coma as a result of a bullet to the brain on June 4; he is unable to care for himself, unable to speak or move.  He can only hear and smell, and think.  His narration — his thoughts — run in two directions: from the early days of his life and the beginning of the student protests, with quick jumps back to their inspirations — the May Fourth Movement, for example — up to the night of the shootings;  and from the time of his being shot forward through the ten years in a coma, commenting on his own difficult physical and emotional state, his mother’s deep worry and cruel remarks (thinking he can’t hear), and such of China and his friends as he can make out from mother’s and visitors’ conversations.  The two narratives are separated in the otherwise undivided book of 703 pages, by italicized, short personal reflections, either of the state of his body, in medical terms, or of the 2,200 hundred year old  Chinese classic of myth and travel — The Book of Mountains and Seas which appears often throughout out the book.

The opening words, italicized,  are mysterious.  They become understandable only after after reading much of the book.

Through the gaping hole where the covered balcony used to be, you see the bulldozed locust tree slowly begin to rise again.  This is a clear sign that from now on you’re going to have to take your life seriously. (more…)

Mexico, Tropic of Cancer

Monday, April 19th, 2010

Sayulita, a small town in Mexico, with a small wonderful stretch of protected Pacific beach and small waves for small surfers lies just below the Tropic of Cancer at latitude 20.868889. That famous line is the northernmost point where the sun gets directly overhead — during the summer solstice. Nowhere north of the line does the sun ever get directly overhead, e.g. nowhere in the United States except Hawaii. The day after the solstice it starts back on its eternal rounds to arrive at the high-noon point at the Tropic of Capricorn for the winter solstice [of the Northern Hemisphere.] This explains why many of the part-time residents of the town start packing their bags in late April, early May. It’s getting hot! Back to British Columbia, or North Shore, Illinois or dozens of other places they have come from to spend some part of the winter.

Just north of Puerto Vallarta, which flew into the American consciousness in 1963 with the tabloid displayed adulteries of Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor during their filming of The Night of the Iguana, Sayulita retained its tranquility and distance over narrow mountainous roads until the 1990s. PV [Puerto Vallarta], as the foreigners like to call it, began to boom in the late sixties after the collapse of near mountain mining was replaced by development, highways and high-rise hotels. It is a major destination for the Love-Boat clan, and hosts a gay-friendly atmosphere as a get-away from big and inland Guadalajara. US hippies and surfers straggled into Sayulita in the late 60s and a decade afterward. It was the proto-typical tropical getaway, not as hot and dry as much of Mexico because the Sierra Madre mountains just kilometers from the beaches catch and hold the off-shore breezes, keeping miles of the coast cool and green for a good part of the year.

We arrived, very late comers indeed, following the advent of the first ATM machines by three years. By now Sauyulita is that odd mix of upscale and downscale that is the lot of many beach towns, from Ocean Beach, San Diego around the Horn and back up to Atlantic City, New Jersey. Some people come because they want to hang. Money means little while time to loaf and noodle with friends and strangers means a lot. Almost like a beach full of sea-lions, with not quite the closeness nor rank odors, folks just want to circulate, eat as they can, swim, sun and surf. Others come later for whom comfort means more. Cool restaurants are better than hot lean-tos. Table cloths are better than quickly swiped Formica. Asphalt roads are better than dust. Cell-phones are better than pay phones. ATMs are better than carrying bundles of cash. So modernity begins to creep in, like a tide slowly rising, not getting to all the streets at the same time, not touching every building.

The newcomers want better homes; good homes bring in brick masons, carpenters, electricians. More asphalt. More restaurants, more beer trucks, more t-shirts for sale, real estate offices, surfing classes… The foreigners bring their own cultures with them. They notice that Mexican kids are only in school 4 hours a day, in poor conditions. They organize. They help change the infrastructure. They volunteer to teach computer skills, after getting computers sent from friends and relatives in the states. The foreigners form a community improvement organization. At its best it is bi-cultural, bi-national mixing the good, tossing the bad. It depends on volunteers who come and go. Things get done, sometimes too slow which is probably better than sometimes too fast. Kids are learning science of the sea and the local wet lands from surfers who are re-remembering university classes they had come here to escape from. (more…)

The Greatest Show on Earth: Richard Dawkins

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

I’ve just finished a several week virtual book club with a friend in Colorado.  We both downloaded and listened while driving, to Richard Dawkins’ latest book on evolution, The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution.  During the day one of us would call the other to appraise our progress, go over what struck us the most, or what was most difficult.  In addition we kept up a shared document at Evernote, an Intenet based note-keeping site.  We wrote up salient points from Dawkins’ arguments, posted links to supporting material and pasted in charts, photos and cartoons that seemed apropos.

Dawkins, along with the late Stephen Jay Gould, is one of the most widely read explicators of evolutionary biology in the world.  Unlike many of his peers, he takes on with gusto the assertions and beliefs and confusions of  creationists, in all their camps.  His Blind Watchmaker, 1986, was an earlier attempt to show how evolution — “the nonrandom survival of randomly varying hereditary equipment”, as he calls it — can explain the complexity of all biological beings, including man.  There is no need to posit a skilled “watchmaker,” e.g. God, to account for us.

The Greatest Show was written to coincide with the 200th anniversary of Darwin’s birth, in an effort to close what Dawkins felt was a serious gap left by his previous six books.  All of them assumed evolution to be true.  “Looking back,” he says, “the evidence for evolution itself was nowhere set out.”  Thus this book, an impressive, serious presentation of the current state of knowledge not only of the paleontological evidence but of cell growth and behavior, DNA replication, proteins,  enzymes, structural homology, bacterial experimentation and much more.  Every chapter deserves second readings, particularly when the material or connections between arguments is new to the reader.

The problem is however, he has another central preoccupation — the worrying success of creationists, with lots of money and well crafted obfuscations, at casting doubt on evolutionary theory and on much of science itself.  [42% of American believe life has existed in its present form since the beginning of time, according to a 2008 Pew poll.] The problem is not just one of intellectual disagreement — which Dawkins has had plenty of with Gould and others, but that “when [teachers] explore and explain the very nature of life itself, they are harried and stymied, hassled and bullied, even threatened with the loss of their jobs.”  Thus The Greatest Show is written very much with the creationist arguments in mind.  Pains are taken to show the silliness of many of them.  Winding the two themes together, however, has led to a book that doesn’t quite succeed in either. (more…)

Darwin’s Influence on Western Thought

Saturday, November 28th, 2009

In honor of the 150th anniversary of the publication of The Origin of Species, last Tuesday, November 24, Scientific American released from its pay archives, a very interesting essay, written in July, 2000, by Ernst Mayr (now deceased) on Darwin’s Influence on Modern Thought. The whole essay is worth reading — and will only be available for a month, for free.  Here are a few snips to whet your appetite.

The Darwinian Zeitgeist
A 21st-century person looks at the world quite differently than a citizen of the Victorian era did. This shift had multiple sources, particularly the incredible advances in technology. But what is not at all appreciated is the great extent to which this shift in thinking indeed resulted from Darwin’s ideas.

Remember that in 1850 virtually all leading scientists and philosophers were Christian men. The world they inhabited had been created by God, and as the natural theologians claimed, He had instituted wise laws that brought about the perfect adaptation of all organisms to one another and to their environment. At the same time, the architects of the scientific revolution had constructed a worldview based on physicalism (a reduction to spatiotemporal things or events or their properties), teleology, determinism and other basic principles. Such was the thinking of Western man prior to the 1859 publication of On the Origin of Species. The basic principles proposed by Darwin would stand in total conflict with these prevailing ideas.

First, Darwinism rejects all supernatural phenomena and causations. The theory of evolution by natural selection explains the adaptedness and diversity of the world solely materialistically. It no longer requires God as creator or designer (although one is certainly still free to believe in God even if one accepts evolution). …

Second, Darwinism refutes typology. From the time of the Pythagoreans and Plato, the general concept of the diversity of the world emphasized its invariance and stability. This viewpoint is called typology, or essentialism. The seeming variety, it was said, consisted of a limited number of natural kinds (essences or types), each one forming a class. The members of each class were thought to be identical, constant, and sharply separated from the members of other essences.

Variation, in contrast, is nonessential and accidental. A triangle illustrates essentialism: all triangles have the same fundamental characteristics and are sharply delimited against quadrangles or any other geometric figures. An intermediate between a triangle and a quadrangle is inconceivable. Typological thinking, therefore, is unable to accommodate variation and gives rise to a misleading conception of human races. For the typologist, Caucasians, Africans, Asians or Inuits are types that conspicuously differ from other human ethnic groups. This mode of thinking leads to racism. (Although the ignorant misapplication of evolutionary theory known as “social Darwinism” often gets blamed for justifications of racism, adherence to the disproved essentialism preceding Darwin in fact can lead to a racist viewpoint.)

Darwin completely rejected typological thinking and introduced instead the entirely different concept now called population thinking. …

Third, Darwin’s theory of natural selection made any invocation of teleology unnecessary. From the Greeks onward, there existed a universal belief in the existence of a teleological force in the world that led to ever greater perfection. This “final cause” was one of the causes specified by Aristotle. After Kant, in the Critique of Judgment, had unsuccessfully attempted to describe biological phenomena with the help of a physicalist Newtonian explanation, he then invoked teleological forces. Even after 1859, teleological explanations (orthogenesis) continued to be quite popular in evolutionary biology. The acceptance of the Scala Naturae and the explanations of natural theology were other manifestations of the popularity of teleology. Darwinism swept such considerations away.

(The designation “teleological” actually applied to various different phenomena. Many seemingly end-directed processes in inorganic nature are the simple consequence of natural laws—a stone falls or a heated piece of metal cools because of laws of physics, not some end-directed process. Processes in living organisms owe their apparent goal-directedness to the operation of an inborn genetic or acquired program. Adapted systems, such as the heart or kidneys, may engage in activities that can be considered goal seeking, but the systems themselves were acquired during evolution and are continuously fine-tuned by natural selection. Finally, there was a belief in cosmic teleology, with a purpose and predetermined goal ascribed to everything in nature. Modern science, however, is unable to substantiate the existence of any such cosmic teleology.)

Fourth, Darwin does away with determinism. Laplace notoriously boasted that a complete knowledge of the current world and all its processes would enable him to predict the future to infinity. Darwin, by comparison, accepted the universality of randomness and chance throughout the process of natural selection. (Astronomer and philosopher John Herschel referred to natural selection contemptuously as “the law of the higgledy-piggledy.”) That chance should play an important role in natural processes has been an unpalatable thought for many physicists. Einstein expressed this distaste in his statement, “God does not play dice.” Of course, as previously mentioned, only the first step in natural selection, the production of variation, is a matter of chance. The character of the second step, the actual selection, is to be directional. …

So, do, read it all. Print it out to read on November 24th of every year!  Fine Thanksgiving reading.

And by the way, the whole of The Origin is available at the Gutenberg Project.

Muddy River: A Town in China

Saturday, September 26th, 2009

The greater the flood of news the faster we are carried along.  We have time to see only the surfaces of events before we are swept beyond them, especially if the events are in countries enormous and far away.

Uighurs attack Hans who attack Uighurs in China. China is making terrifying contributions to CO2 buildup but is working more than many to bring it down.  Tibet has always been a part of China; Tibet has always been its own nation.  And so we know ten thousand things but we know nothing below the surface.  Even if we go there and are toured around and make friends; even if we adopt unwanted Chinese infant girls ; even if we mourn the dead from Tianamen in 1989 or the impoverished poor protesting the fouling of their air, water and soil, we know not much.

vagrants.cgi To get below the surface at all we have to move from the wash of news and enter into history or even better, into fiction.  To know reality we have to enter into fiction.   YiYun Li’s recently published The Vagrants, about life in Muddy River, a fictional town in China in 1979, is a marvelous glass bottomed boat through which we can look into the life of the town and the lives of the people.  In 1979 Mao had died, the Gang of Four had been arrested and the Cultural Revolution was over.  The first possibilities of public, democratic expression were being felt in Beijing and around the country, but the outlines of who was in power and what was the correct line were far from clear. The news traveled slowly,  with travelers and interpretations of what was being said in the press and on the radio and who was saying it.  There was none of the speedy personal communications of the internet, cell-phones and texting which have aided and kept anonymous those who have spoken out recent years. Yet small groups of people breathed a different air and wanted to believe it was there to stay.

The central event of the book is the execution of Gu Shan, a young, female Red Guard “…at first a fanatic believer in Chairman Mao and his Cultural Revolution and later an adamant nonbeliever and a harsh critic of her generation’s revolutionary zeal.”  Before she is executed for her counterrevolutionary acts she is taken to four public denunciations, the occasion for a public holiday of sorts. School children are walked to the stadium to witness. Perhaps they notice the blood stained rag around her neck through which the vocal cords had been severed — to avoid any embarrassment to the Party officials. Away from the crowds she will be taken to a snowy island for her execution, but not before her kidneys are extracted, en vivo. The official who is to receive them doesn’t want to be tainted with the ghosts of the dead.

Gu Shan’s mother, intent on giving her daughter a proper farewell with a public burning of her clothes, is drawn into a small band of younger people which shares Gu’s urge towards freedom, and means to use her death to celebrate her courage and advance their cause. Her father, a former teacher and intellectual, is appalled both by his daughter’s passion and by the use others want to make of her death. He begins to write long letters to his former wife, a militant communist from whom he separated before having children.

The plot line runs through the richest description imaginable, not only of the hardscrabble town, the one-room shacks with heated brick beds, the cold of the streets, the mud of approaching spring but of the people — from extremely poor, to well-off, public figures, each with their own character traits and opinions. Yiyun Li moves effortlessly between the various stories, all tied together by the death and their relation to it, and tied to each other by their positions in the town and their crossing paths.

Nini is a young adolescent girl, born with a birth defect, the result of her mother being kicked by Gu at the height of her militancy.

“Someone has put a curse on us through you, Nini, and that’s why we never get to have a boy in our family. But today, the one who has done this to us gets to see her final day. The spell is over now, and your father and I will have a son soon.”

Treated as the scullery maid and baby sitter by her parents Nini finds herself drawn to the warmth and kindness of an older boy, Bashi, who is similarly drawn to her and away from the borderline life he is living. In a world of rejection and sadness she manages to persevere, even as Bashi is sent to jail in the closing pages and she heads out of Muddy River with the elderly Huas, the title figures of the story.

“She would take care of the couple, when they were too old to work, with the money in her socks, Nini thought. There was no reason for her to linger in Muddy River, though she knew she would be back in seventeen years, after Bashi had served his sentence for molesting and kidnapping a young child [herself]. She had tried to visit him once, but the guards said only families and relatives were allowed. There was no point in making them understand she was his child bride; there was no point in explaining anything to anyone, the Huas’ included. The only thing to do was to count the days and years to come.”

Kai, a well known radio personality and voice for the status-quo, is another strong female figure in the story.  She, of all of them, changes the most. She walks away from her privileged life, picks up Gu’s cause and suffers a similar fate. Married to a high-ranking family she begins meeting with Jialin, an ailing but fervent rebel trying to rehabilitate Gu’s name. The group manages to have leaflets printed calling for a memorial and petition signing to rehabilitate her name. Stealthily the leaflets are taken door to door. Only the brave appear at the square where a large photograph of the young woman is propped below a statue of Chairman Mao; only the extremely brave, and a few foolish, sign the petition. Kai is one of the party which delivers it to the authorities — leading to disaster for her family, and death in the closing pages for herself.

“Under the policy of giving the harshest punishment to all antigovernment organizations and individuals, three hundred and eleven people who had signed the petition were tried as counterrevolutionaries… Upon reviewing the cases, the provincial officials pointed out that a warning to the masses would not be effective without a death sentence. Kill a chicken to frighten all the mischievous monkeys into silence, one top official urged in writing, and several others chimed in with their consent.”

For all the grimness of the story, both in the behavior of the people and the double execution, The Vagrants is not a labor to read. Li’s graceful sentences and attention to detail, so much of it unknown to us before reading, make us willing spectators of a great canvas, one we want to stand before many times and look again at a particular scene, or notice the description of clothing or food, or twenty minutes in the street.  We read of customs which are not ours but which, embedded in the sympathetically rendered poverty of the lives,   seem not simply exotic but a natural part of what we are seeing.

Li herself has a Tolstoyan sense of history — that life unfolds not at the hands of great men who make events but in those of the millions of people who participate, in millions of different ways.

“[Li] As a writer I am fascinated by small people in community, who are not always in the center of actions, yet who in the end, as onlookers, contribute perhaps as much to history as those who hold key roles. In other words, Hitler did not start his war by himself, nor did Chairman Mao start Cultural Revolution by himself. Those who participate are what I am interested in writing. And Muddy River, as a provincial town, seems a perfect place to investigate the people far from the center of the actions (Beijing, for instance).

[Q:] Yes, I was interested in that choice — showing the action in the provinces rather than in the capital, where events around the Democracy Wall must also have been very dramatic.

[Li] When you choose to write the center of the action — say, the movement in Beijing — it tends to become more political and historical, while my interest always stays with the people — the characters, how they live through certain events; how much their action (or inaction) define not only their own fates but other people’s fates too.”

Mark Pritchard: SF Metro

Li was born and raised in China, and was a teenager at the time of Tiananmen Square — China’s 9/11 she says.  She came to the U.S. to study immunology and found herself caught up in writing, first with short stories and now a fine novel being celebrated around the reading world.  The Vagrants is a grim story but told with unusual dispassion and fine strokes.  It isn’t to be missed.

More about Yiyun Li, here.

Mountain Building and Human Existence

Monday, August 31st, 2009

DevilInMountainsThe tallest peaks in the famous Rocky Mountains of Colorado are half the height of most of the those in the Himalayas and are dwarfed by many mountains in the South American Andes. Why is that? And, where do mountains come from? What makes some mountains grow taller and others grow faster? If mountains affect the weather and thus the climate, is it possible that climate and weather could affect the growth of mountains?

I don’t know about you, but such questions have been with me ever since I realized that the mountains I drove through or flew over were not just rocks and dirt that had somehow been there forever. Living in Marin County, California in the eastern shadow of Mt. Tamalpais helps keep such questions alive. The chert beds so clearly visible, folded back and forth in enormous vertical S’s, on the road to the peak just beg as I drive by: exssssplain this! The green serpentine taunts: how did I get here from miles below the ocean floor? In my daily life of making a living and living with family those questions pop up and recede during the length of a Sunday drive. But they swarm out again, bothering and bewitching me when in the company of many mountains, as I was recently in the Peruvian Andes. Along the way I found the perfect book to consult and bring me a little closer to understanding the mysteries.

Devil in the Mountain: A Search for the Origin of the Andes (2004, Princeton) by Simon Lamb, a British geologist of wide experience in both mountains and in explaining mountains, is a very good book. It will draw in anyone with the stirrings of curiosity of how did these mountains come to be?

It turns out the Andes are young, only 40 million years or so, with many sections of it much younger, rising up as the lower layers skidded up the wedge shaped, and much more solid, Brazilian Shield. The youngest portions of the Canadian-US Rockies by contrast, are 100 to 65 million years old.

Simon’s approach is not pure geology. (more…)