Archive for the ‘Law’ Category

Pakistan: Lawyers in the Streets

Thursday, March 15th, 2007

CNN International, broadcasting in the SF Bay Area in the mid-morning hours, does a good job with important news not seen elsewhere, or at least not seen at such length. This morning the imbroglio in Pakistan between General-President Musharraf and the legal establishment is getting play. Lawyers in business suits and fine shoes are marching along the boulevards with linked arms, some of them bleeding from facial cuts, smoke and tear gas rising.

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan: A political and legal maelstrom has erupted after Pakistan’s president, General Pervez Musharraf, unceremoniously suspended the country’s chief justice last week, in a step that lawyers and rights activists have called an assault on the independence of the judiciary.

The suspension of Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry, who did not shy away from taking on cases that challenged the government, has set off immense controversy and threatens to spiral into a constitutional crisis, according to lawyers and analysts here.


Pakistan in Turmoil

What is interesting about this is the different face we are shown here of Pakistan. So often what we hear about Pakistan leads us to believe that only god fanatics, vicious secret police, Muslim terrorists and a coup empowered President live there. Yet here we have the sacking of the Chief Justice leading to street protests not by the disenfranchised masses but by those who believe in an independent judiciary. Quite an interesting story and not over by a long shot.

[I wonder what year it will be when thousands of lawyers are in the streets of America demanding the ouster of the Attorney General of the United States for breaking his oath of office?]

The story doesn’t stop there, however. The Australian, among other papers, is tying the unrest and potential danger to Musharraf’s hold on power, to US interference (per usual) in the internal affairs of another country.

THE US has indicated for the first time that it might be willing to back plans by elite echelons of the military in Islamabad to oust Pervez Musharraf from power, as the Pakistani President was beset by major new difficulties over his attempts to sack the country’s chief justice.
Reports yesterday quoting highly placed US diplomatic and intelligence officials – previously rusted on to the view that General Musharraf was an indispensable Western ally in the battle against terrorism – outlined a succession plan to replace him.

US officials told The New York Times the plan would see the Vice-Chief of the Army, Ahsan Saleem Hyat, take over from General Musharraf as head of the military and former banker Mohammedmian Soomro installed as president, with General Hyat wielding most of the power

US and the Ousting of Musharraf

The big fear about Pakistan is, of course, the combination of nuclear weapons, known and unknown webs of arms trading, a powerful and contentious military, radical Islam and the proximity of India and radical Hindiism. Oh, and the pulsating boil of Kashmir to provide a cause for almost anything…

Attorney Firings Began in White House

Tuesday, March 13th, 2007

As early as the opening months of 2005 the White House legal counsel, Harriet Miers (yes that one), was inquiring about firing all 93 US Attorneys. The compromise, reached almost two years later, was to fire 8 of them.

White House Involved in Firings

Monday, Kyle Sampson, the Chief of Staff of Attorney General Gonzalez, resigned.

Sampson left his post after acknowledging that he did not tell others in the department about the extent of his communication with the White House on the firings, leading them to give incomplete information to Congress.
Sampson played a key role in putting together the list of eight U.S. Attorneys who were fired last year.


Resignation of Native Son

By the way, “In 2002 Mr. Sampson, a Mormon, told the Brigham Young University news service that he admired Mr. Bush because the president recognized that politics and religious beliefs could not be separated.”

Senator Schumer is on CNN calling again, and more heatedly, for the resignation of Gonzales — who either didn’t know what his Chief of Staff was doing, or because he did.

“I had not idea how high it went… there has been unprecedented breech of trust, abuse of power and misuse of the Justice Department.”

The NY Times lead editorial yesterday referred to Gonzales as “consigliere to Mr. Bush’s imperial presidency,” and called for his replacement.

State Secret: The Invisible Cloak

Saturday, March 3rd, 2007

In all juvenile fiction the dream of the hero is to get hold of a cloak of invisibility — something that will prevent the bad guys from seeing their nemesis arriving. Of course the bad guys have their invisible cloaks too. Money is the traditional means to make invisible the malfeasance — a bribe here, a buy-out there. Calls to loyalty work, too; black-listing, death threats. When all that fails there is now the super impenetrable, can’t be broken, ripped or torn cloak of invisibility — no matter how horrific the crime: State Secrets! The Bushes are not the first to wear it but they are the first to make it their everyday casual wear.

Here is a man abducted and tortured, very likely by agents of the United States of America, beacon of freedom and justice around the world until just a few years back, and he can’t hold anyone accountable: State Secrets!

Appeals Court Upholds Dismissal of Suit

Habeus Corpus: Not in My Constitution

Wednesday, January 24th, 2007

In one of the more astounding –though it should not have been– revelations about his intellectual, historical and moral reach, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales told Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA), who had voted for the Gonzalez confirmation, that “the Constitution doesn’t guarantee habeas corpus.”

For plenty a comment on this see ThinkProgress, Crooks and Liars, The Blue State. For the definitive take on Mr Gonzales you could check in on Steven Colbert.