Posts Tagged ‘Movies’

Three Monkeys – A Film from Turkey

Monday, January 23rd, 2012

Three Monkeys — the famous three monkeys of not seeing, speaking or hearing– is a sorrowful, long-take, film of domestic life at the edge in modern Turkey.  Nuri Bilge Ceylan, one of Turkey’s premier film makers, is never noted for quick-cut, action films [see review of Distant, here]  but he outdoes himself here.  Static shots of a room with doors and hallway on the far side are held for 30 seconds or so.  A character walks in, lingers, walks out.  The shot is held.  Or, a head shot of a brooding, sick-at-heart man, lying on his side in bed. A strange snake-like thing appears over his shoulder: a child’s arm.  The shot is held. All is motionless except the slow blinking of eyes in pain.  Then the arm is pulled away. A ghostly figure recedes in the still frame.  30 seconds or so.

Contrast this to the serious emotions at play.  A wealthy, running-for-election man, Servet (Ercan Kesal),  hits a pedestrian on a dark rainy street.  He talks his employee, Eyüp (Yavuz Bingöl),  into admitting guilt, as the driver.  The sentence will be short, his salary will continue to go home and there will be a bonus at the end; Servet can continue running for office.  Clearly a stumble away from a economic fall,  Eyüp takes the rap.  His son İsmail (Ahmet RıfatŞungar),  a drifting college age boy, and his wife Hacer (Hatice Aslan)  are left at home in a patched together house with a distant view of the water;  both unhappy.  The boy convinces his mother that they should ask the boss for an advance on the pay-off.  He can get a car, and stay away from his thuggish friends.  The mother agrees and goes to ask.  Big mistake, as we all know when she walks into boss-man’s door.

When Eyüp gets out and his suspicions rise about the money — “Who went to get the money,” he grills his son, “you, or your mother?”– the tension is palpable.  A surprising bedroom scene, his large brown fingers caressing her nipple, teeters between reunion love-making and jealous violence.  Her face, unfriended by the lighting, is as drawn and harrowed a female face as you’ve likely seen in recent movie making.  All I should say more is that at  the end Eyüp asks a down-and-out friend if he’ll take the beef for the death of another man; the sentence will be short, it will be warmer in the prison than in the store-room he now sleeps in, there will be a bonus at the end.  Everything in between is the story.

Some of the shots are against wide expanses of sky filled with rain clouds.

Some are set up as still photos, lushly dark with a shimmer of natural light from a window.

For all the beauty of the film, and the doubling-back, ancient story of hierarchy, sex, loneliness, fidelity, betrayal, Ceylan’s very measured pace takes a special kind of viewer.  Let me say, don’t try to watch this late in the evening, stretched out on a couch.  You’ll miss important parts while your eyelids shift scenes as slowly as he does.  Alert, ready to follow his lead, it’s a fine, slow-dance of a movie. Certainly worth watching. Hold the popcorn.  Sip some moody gin.

Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy– A Short Take

Thursday, December 29th, 2011

I was not alone in the crowds the other night exiting Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy wondering what it the heck we had missed.  The consensus was that you had to have read the novel to make head or tail of it.  Well, maybe we could make the tail out, but not the head.  The alternative was to think we were too dumb to pick up the cues, clues, asides, visuals and all else that a movie is supposed to supply.  And leaving an audience thinking it is too dumb to understand is not a sure way to cinematic success.

The essential problem I suppose is that John Le Carre novels are not simple whodunits. There are always enough traps within traps, false leads, red herrings and smoke and mirrors to keep your head spinning, even at a leisurely lets-read-that-again pace.  Packing this into a movie, with its own genre requirements for fast action and ratcheting tension, is a serious problem.  Not that it can’t  be done, but this one misses; the packing job isn’t up to the mark.

The film started out with the story being told before and under the titles.  Lots of stuff is happening, not much of it related.  As I hadn’t read the novel I hadn’t a clue as to who was appearing, one after the other, or what they meant to one another.   I didn’t get a sense of coherence until well into the movie when Smiley walks into his apartment and finds Ricki Tarr, another spook, with a tale to tell that sets the mystery straight, and the sleuthing begins.

I’m glad to have a Euro version of a major British spy novel, and with a Swedish director. On the whole I like the throttled back versions of thrillers I’ve seen from the continent; they depend less on buckets of blood than their American counterparts. ( Erik Skjoldbjaerg’s 1997 version of Insomnia was more to my taste than Chrisotpher Nolan’s 2002.)   In this case, though, I just didn’t get it.  Who was who; who was sleeping with whom, and why did it matter?  Was it a clue, or a diversion?  Who was Karla anyway?  What were the dark rooms with listening devices?  In fact, too often, I couldn’t figure out what time-frame we were in: the dark present, or the dark past.

I’ll admit I have a touch of prosopognosia: my facial recognition is not a strong as my wife’s, though it’s not all that bad.  But without some redundancy of signs, I was often at a loss.   I knew I’d seen fellow X but in what context, with whom, and doing what?  An accidental sighting of a passionate embrace at a Christmas party; no faces seen.  Smiley looks stricken.  Why?  Is it his wife?  How are we supposed to know?  And if so, what does it have to do with the plot?

It sort of ruined the thrill for me to keep feeling I was dumb.

I don’t know whether it was the screen play, the directing or production imposed cuts. Perhaps they were all so familiar with the story they couldn’t imagine what we innocents didn’t know.   I suspect the editing pared down the scenes too much, and juxtaposed too quickly.  A re-cut to set up the players a little more memorably, a few better cues as to whether a cut from one scene to the next  took us back into  a memory, or into another character’s scene same time-frame and a good tight thriller could be had.  The acting was very good; the set design great. Enjoyed the views of Budapest and Istanbul.  But who did what to whom?  What in the heck was the brought-back-from-the dead spy doing living in a trailer outside the school he was teaching at, and why on earth did he suddenly turn against the sad little kid he’d befriended?

I don’t mean you shouldn’t go.  Just bone up on the plot and characters before you do: IMDB, or focusfeatures, or  Wikipedia, or here

Then the puzzle pieces will be somewhat familiar and you’ll enjoy.

 

“Shame” – A Real Shame

Wednesday, December 21st, 2011

I’m going to save you $10 and two hours of your life right here.  The movie Shame, with deep pretense to be about a disabling affliction for thousands — of New Yorkers anyway– is a real shame.  Sex addiction.  Joyless sex addiction.  Joyless male sex addiction.  The doo-dad only works if affection is not involved: prostitutes, quicky pick-ups against a wall in a seedy neighborhood, anonymous male on male sex, sex with magazine exciters, sex over the internet.  But try a little tenderness and willie goes wonkers.  Man holds his head. Woman says it’s OK, but it’s not.  But he gets over it: calls a prostitute and scratches the itch.

Two hours to show us the problem. No solution. Last scene, bereft and broken sprawled in a deserted waterfront scene.  Sister in a pretty bad way, too.  Boss, also.  One bright light is a co-worker with whom he can’t do it.  Too bad…

And slow.  Long held shots showing the man staring out on the river.  Long shots, with portentious music during a get-over-it three-some.  It reminded me of the old porn movies which started out with a doctor’s admontion that sex could bring disease, and here was what to watch out for.  This was more, let’s say art-porn.  This is an art movie, not porn, so you aren’t going to go to hell for watching it.

The hell is in watching it.

Rotten Tomatoes gives it a 78% though all think it is grim grim grim…

A good film might be made of the subject, but this was not it.

The Arch of Triumph: Love in Paris, 1938 — A Short Take

Friday, November 18th, 2011

Ingrid Bergman looks her fabled, youthful best and Charles Boyer dark and dashing as her handsome, older lover in The Arch of Triumph a forgotten minor gem of WW II movies.  Set in Paris from August of 1938 to the Nazi invasion of Poland on Sept 1, 1939, in wonderful blacks and whites, pouring rain, sodden trench coats, dripping fedoras,  with immigrants from all over Europe jamming the International Hotel, a wretched Joan Madou –Ingrid Bergman —  is rescued from disabling despair after the death of her lover by an unflappable Dr. Ravic — Charles Boyer.   Though the inevitability of their love is apparent to us, he is of a different mind.  He is illegally in Paris, fled from Austria after being tortured by the Gestapo in 1933.  His life is uncertain; he has been deported many times; Ravic is his third identity.  He deposits her in a hotel room not near his own, despite her obvious  need to be closely watched, and held.  Despite his precautions their ill-fated love affair begins, set against the secrets he can’t tell her, and her need to be secure in love.

If the approach of the war, certain to our history worn eyes, is not enough tension, Ravic’s sighting of his former torturer — Charles Laughton as Ivon Haake– in the crowds along the Champs Elysees will bring it to the twisting point.  A terrifying night ride through the Bois de Boulogne with Haake first drunk and then alert to his danger may force a few eyes closed until its over — even with the more violent scenes left on the cutting room floor as required by the 1948 Motion Picture Association production code.

Bergman is given some pretty ragged lines, and a change of character improbable enough to let us fall out of love with her, so despite the promise it doesn’t rise to the level of Casablanca, though certainly a worthy companion piece.  There is also a 1985 remake of Arch of Triumph, with Anthony Hopkins and Lesley-Anne Downey.  I haven’t seen it but Hopkins would make it a good bet.

The script is based on a novel of the same name by Erich Maria Remarque, known world wide for All Quiet on the Western Front.  The novel of course has more time than the film to deepen the sense of Paris in 1938-39 — as the world is falling apart.  Ravic is an expert surgeon but must operate clandestinely, as he does in the film, but on more people.  We meet his patients and feel Ravic’s humanity as he repairs a botched abortion, and amputates a leg of a young boy.  He runs a weekly health check for high-class prostitutes; we see the consequences for those to do not pass.

Remarque handles the affairs of the heart in the swirling fear of approaching war well; the approach and retreat, the hope appearing and hiding, the indecision then recognition of feelings unexpected and true.  As with the movie — a good, if not superior creation.

Hula Girls: Coal Miners’ Daughters in Japan — a Movie

Friday, September 9th, 2011

Around our house there are two streams of movie selections: dark, meaningful films, preferably by “auteurs,” about people overcoming terrible odds immersed in worldly cruelty, or those that are light and witty, with not too much meanness, about people solving small problems in the family or neighborhood –maybe in a little house on the prairie– and all the better if there is singing and dancing.  Once in a while the two streams dash up against each another and produce, as in the case of  Hula Girls, a 2006 Japanese production, something light with moments of  low-brow silliness, some over acted fear and anger but about overcoming the odds, stepping into a fearful challenge and winning –  with dancing.  It’s sort of a Rocky for girls.

In north eastern Japan, not too far from where the tsunami and nuclear calamity recently happened, one hundred years of a coal mine is methodically moving towards an end.  Yep, coal mines in Japan, with the workers coming out of the mines looking every bit like our Appalachian coal miners, covered in coal dust and militant union men to the bone.  Meetings about the layoffs lead to very un-Japanese behavior — at least as we’ve gotten to know it in movie and story.  The owner makes a low bow of apology and then the fists fly.  It is autumn.  The cold winds of winter are blowing the dust and trash through the housing tract.  Things look bleak.

One town father sees the writing on the wall.  The mine is going to close and the town is going to die unless income and jobs are found.  His brain-child is to erect a huge covered pavilion with palm trees and a swimming pool — remember, this is north eastern Japan.  It gets cold there; damned cold, especially when warmth is provided by coats and kerosene heaters.  How will the palm trees take to this?  Never mind.  He presses on.

Onto the scene arrives the hula dance teacher.  When the daughters of the town get a look at the outfits — which actually show the belly button– all but three flee in horror.  The “sensi” [teacher] (Yasuko Matsuyuki) is down on her luck and not too happy about being in this god-forsaken place, especially with a few silly girls who won’t shake their booties.  Nevertheless, she takes the few in hand, plays the tough no-nonsense trainer [and the ending is perfectly predictable from here. ;-) ]

Two of the girls are especially inspired and throw themselves into it, even in the face of opposition from a tough “coal-dresser” mother and conservative ire from the fathers.  More girls overcome their shyness and gradually the classes fill up.  The lumbering 6 foot daughter of one of the few supportive fathers eventually finds her way to a very watchable shimmy.  Fabulous costumes materialize.  The language of the hula hands begins to be spoken with near fluency.

The initial road trip to drum up excitement in the region is the predictable embarrassment.  A few drunks hurl cushions after they realize there is not going to be any “taking it off.”   The girls get better and better,  making their way through trials and troubles, screaming matches, sensei walking out and one of the top girls being taken away to a far away village.  Eventually the big day is upon them and, lo!, they have become a wonderful, professional, colorful dance troupe.  The  audience is a sell out.  The girls get  standing ovations.  The tough mother sneaks in to watch her daughter and admits that maybe working while smiling is an OK thing.  Her once shy girl Kimiko [played by Yû Aoi]  has become a ravishing hula queen leading the town out of certain ghost-town status. I’m crying and gee, these kids can do anything!  Hawaii in Japan — like London Bridge in  Lake Havasu City, Arizona.  If you build it, they will pay to see it.

Aw shucks,  I enjoyed it. As there were coal miners and people bravely taking a  stand, my sense of it all being too silly got outvoted.  To add more justification Hula Girls won several Japanese “Oscar” awards: Best Director, best Actress, best supporting Actress…

 

We’re playing lots of Israel  Kamakawiwo’ole this week to keep the sweet sound going.

Alhaam: A Film from Iraq — 2005

Saturday, September 3rd, 2011

Alhaam, a movie shot in Iraq in 2004 — during the full catastrophe of the US invasion and related Iraqi insurgencies– is the rawest, hardest to watch movie of war I have ever seen — and I’ve seen many.    Not as tightly plotted or scripted as such American movies as The Hurt LockerFull Metal Jacket or The Thin Red Line  –which are in any case, about Americans in these wars–  the ragged effects of hand-held camera work, the not quite seamless narrative, the sometime loss of control in acting, adds to the chaos of what we are seeing – what they are experiencing.  In American war movies, even if hard-hitting and raw, it is still possible to think — this is not happening; this is a movie.  That’s Sean Penn, or Brad Pitt.  They were on the cover of People this month.  In Ahlaam it is very hard to think any of those things.  Whatever knowledge we retain that the movie has a director and actors it is hard not to believe that this is not a pure documentary of citizens caught in hell.

The film begins on the second day of the infamous  ”Shock and Awe,” air campaign as American explosives light up the sky over Baghdad, scenes most of us are familiar with from the actual days of the bombing, scenes we saw on CNN.  One of the buildings blown to smithereens is an insane asylum.  Through the broken walls and over smoking rubble the terrified inmates escape. The film follows several of them through the streets and back into their lives to show how they came to be there, beneath the bombs.

Alhaam, the lead character – whose name means Hope–  is bubbling and pretty on the days of her engagement.  She and her fiancee meet by the Euphrates and laugh about having their mothers take care of all the children they plan to have.  Her wedding day, with the dancing, ululating family,  is just a day before the bombing.  As she is about to come downstairs for the ceremony, masked Iraqis burst into the house and kidnap her fiancee.  Through most of the film she staggers across the still-being-bombed cityscape trying to find him.

Ali’s story and institutionalization began in 1998, during the earlier bombing of Iraq by US and British forces during Operation Desert Fox.  An easy going soldier, he tries to cheer his best friend, in the army with him, who constantly talks about fleeing Iraq, the army, and the butchery of Saddam Hussein and beginning again in Europe.  During a bombardment the friend is badly wounded and Ali makes a heroic effort to carry him across the desert to get help.  He is eventually arrested by Iraqis, having gone mad and still carrying the corpse of his friend.  He is charged with desertion, and incarcerated.  In the asylum he calls the name of the friend over and over, obsessed with his inability to have saved him.

The third of the major characters is Mehdi, a hard working, diligent medical student who, after passing his board, is rounded up by that Baathists and impressed into the army — because of his father’s communist ties.  It is Mehdi who is in charge of the ruined hospital and leads a desperate search — with Ali in the lead– for those who have escaped and are roaming madly in the madness.

There are some over-the-top moments which might have been more powerful if more understated; even in a movie about chaos and human emotion we seem to have a sense of “over acting.”  The trope of inmates running, or escaping, an asylum as an allegory for the rest of us may be a bit cliched to educated readers, but as the crazed Ahlaam searches for, and occasionally ”sees” her fiancee, when she is raped  by Iraqis who should be the first to help her, when a masked sniper deliberately picks off citizens, including some the inmates struggling back to the hospital any idea of cliche is blown away.  Some of the shots, the image of Ali carrying his friend through the mirage emitting desert comes to mind, are as powerful as any you are likely to have seen in any movie, anytime.

There isn’t much to be cheerful about during the course of the movie; nor in the war, of course.  Mehdi, the doctor is a wonderful portrait of patience and desperation, trying to befriend the terrified inmates, offering them cigarettes to show he means no harm,  carrying one through the swampy mud at the edge of the Euphrates…  Ali, racing around Baghdad often in nothing more than boxer shorts,  becomes the idiot-every man rising out of his personal maddness to help those around him.

Next to the hell of  Alhaam Hieronymus Bosch’s Hell seems almost a cartoon of fanciful symbols, a misleading distraction from the actual hells that humans create.

Mohammed Al-Daradji, the director, is a young Dutch-Iraqi film maker, living  in Europe to avoid persecution from the Baathist regime.  When the war broke out in 2003 he went back wanting to make a film about ordinary Iraqi people. Ahlaam was shot in Baghdad in extremely difficult conditions – not only did he have to work around curfews and electricity cuts but members of his crew were arrested both by insurgents and by the Americans, neither side believing that they were simply making a film.

An interesting interview at Electric Sheep, can be found here.

 

AD: The character of Ahlaam is the one that brought me to the story. In 2003 I was watching the news about the war in Iraq while I was studying for a Master at Leeds University and I saw a reportage about a mental institution in Baghdad and how they were affected by the war. And then I saw Ahlaam – she was talking in a nonsensical way and it really shocked me. I couldn’t sleep that night. I dreamt about Ahlaam, on the street in Baghdad as you saw in the film.

VS: So Ahlaam was a real character?

AD: She was a real character, but I couldn’t meet her when I went to the mental institution in Baghdad two months after I saw the reportage. But I met another character, Ali. She wasn’t called Ahlaam. Ahlaam in Arabic means ‘dreams’. It’s not just about Ahlaam’s dreams but it’s also the dreams of the other characters, Ali’s dreams, Doctor Mehdi’s dreams, the dreams of any Iraqi who’s lived under Saddam’s regime and under the invasion. So for me it was about giving two meanings to the title: it’s the girl, and it’s also the meaning of the word.

 Alhaam was his first full length work, which he followed up with Son of  Babylon, not yet available at Netflix, but in the queue.  It was made under the auspices of Human Film  which also has other note-worth films to its credit, a new style production company like Participant Media, which ties it’s movies into vehicles not for product placement but for social change.

 

Twinned, Human Film & Iraq Al-Rafidain established in 2005, with a goal to seek and explore individual creativity, producing films with a social conscience and impact.
With roots in the east through our bases in Leeds (UK), Rotterdam (NL) and Baghdad (IQ), we are collectively committed to producing innovative, compelling films that entertain, inspire and challenge perceptions, furthering understanding on critical human issues to worldwide audiences through film.

Through our existence, we have the opportunity to share stories that we have a strong personal belief in, and through not applying any language, cultural, political, religious, or any other barriers to our filmmaking practice our work has the potential to affect and inspire.

Over the past 5 years we have successfully completed 3 feature films in Iraq; Ahlaam (2006), Iraq’s official entry for the 2011 Oscars and Golden Globes, Son of Babylon (2010) the recipient of the Berlinale IFF Peace Prize, Amnesty Film Award 2010 and Karlovy Vary’s NETPAC Award and most recently: Iraq, War, Love, God and Madness (2010).

 

You won’t find a more honest, direct and even heroic account of the toll war takes on non-combatants than in this movie.  Ahlaam is a must see, even if you can’t watch some of it.

 

Inch’ Allah Dimanche: Algerian Immigrants to France

Thursday, June 16th, 2011

Immigration is big in the news these days – mostly the opposition to it–  around the world.  It is absolutely the case that most people welcome immigrants when they need them and curse them when they don’t.  What the natives really want is the fairy tale world of snapping fingers to make the genies of cheap labor appear and disappear as needed.  It was as true in France after WW II as it is now.

Inch’Allah Dimanche, a quite wonderful, if not quite complete, film from French Algerian director Yamina Benguigui, explores in microcosm what happens when, after ten years, women and children are allowed to join their worker-husbands in mainland France.  Zouina, as played by the wonderful Fejria Deliba,  also French Algerian, brings three children, and her ferocious mother-in-law [Rabia Mokeddem] to a small row-house in Saint Quentin, France.  After a too painful parting from her own mother at embarkation — with the mother-in-law cursing her, and the children frantic — she arrives to a husband, Ahmed,  [Zinedine Soualem] who is more engaged with his mother than with his wife.

Zouina, despite having to steal the key to get out of the house, begins to make her way around the neighborhood and into the prize flower bed of her next door neighbor after the hyper competitive horticulturist stabs the kids’ soccer ball for a transgression into her sweet babies – that would be flowers.  She learns the strange ways of shopping, that you can’t prepare your coffee in the back yard, and that some French women are demons and others are friends.  She knows when one brings a gift of lipstick and rouge it must be hidden, after a quick try and pleasure at seeing the results.

Deliba  is really wonderful as the determined, curious — and beautiful– mother.   Her  mother-in-law is a dragon of almost unbelievable portions, though she won’t be seen as a stranger to many cultures we are more familiar with.  The man of the house is alternately a beginning guitar player painfully picking out “Apache,”  a dutiful son and a rage-filled husband.

The weakness of the movie  is that Benguigui didn’t quite make up her mind as to whether she had a comedy going, or an angry tale about women in the Arab world.  The husband administers several savage and prolonged beatings.  A heart wrenching scene ends Zouina’s  first contact with another Algerian woman well into the film.  On the other hand, the music, the exaggerated sneaking and running, the flower-gardening neighbors,  sometimes cast it as a French comedy — promising to be all well that ends well.

And in fact it does end well as, after one more escapade, Zouina comes home with her kids alone on a bus whose driver she has caught the eye of.   Ahmed, standing outside waiting for her, suddenly orders his mother to shut-up and go back inside and seems to leap to a new regard of his wife — who announces proudly “From now on, I am walking my children to school.”

An evening of intelligent fun and social commentary, not nearly as disturbing as BiutifulAlejandro González Iñárritu‘s wrenching film, with Javier Bardem, about immigrant life in Barcelona.  Inch’Allah Dimanche won several awards in 2001 for best film, best actress and for  the director.  A very nice sound track complements much of it,  including several songs by Algeria’s well known Berber singer and song writer, Idir, [and here and here,] Alain Blesing’s “Lail” and “Djin,”  Hamou Cheheb’s sweet and scathing “Mon enfance,” [My Childhood.]  (English [google] translation below the fold.)

The title by the way, mixed Arabic and French, translates to “Sunday, God Willing.”

I’m going to watch it again, just to gaze, like the bus driver,  at Fejria Deliba‘s smile.

(more…)