Posts Tagged ‘Will Kirkland’

Passage of Tears – a novel from Djibouti

Friday, January 6th, 2012

A returning ex-pat, an espionage mission, a mysterious Islamist counter-intelligence figure locked away in Djibouti’s Devil’s Islands, a palimpsest of letters written to Walter Benjamin appearing through the notes a scribe is taking from “The Master,” a rageful twin brother who plans the death of his twin, devotion to the great African pianist and singer Abdulla Ibrahim.  All these are woven up in a small, intriguing novel, Passage of Tears, by Abdourahman A. Waberi, in an excellent translation by David and Nicole Ball.  First published in French in 2009, the English version comes to us in a nice Seagull Books edition, in 2011.

In alternating chapters by the narrator, Djibril, and the scribe, Djamal, the setting and story unfold, at once two biographies — which may be one–, a situation report of the Horn of Africa, and an appreciation of Walter Benjamin who died decades before, an immigrant in flight, but who created a new kind of history, much admired by the narrators:

…a conception of history, which was not theoretical or arid in the least.  It appealed to me [Djibril] because it seemed as sensitive to human beings as the stories my Grandpa Assod used to tell.”

Djibril, having lived in Canada for many years, has returned as an employee of one of the new private security firms to which nations are outsourcing their intelligence work.

“I returned to Djibouti for professional reasons, not to feast at the table of nostalgia or open old wounds.

…My mission consists in feeling out the temperature on the ground, making sure the country is secure, the situation is stable and the terrorists under control.”

The problem is, he is in fact, caught up in his nostalgia; an old wound is opened, wide.

The chapters from Djamal, are titled with letters of the Arabic alphabet.  Alif, Ba, Ta  to Ya, and so, far less indicative than those from Djibril:  The Scent of the Father; Revolt in the Desert.  Though apparently deep inside the prison, Djamal and the Master are intimately aware of Djibril’s presence.  Many of his notes, intended to be transcriptions of the Master’s sermons and homilies, are directed to him — as though he were the auditor, or reader.

So what do you know…you trickster from McGill, you wanted to get close to us !  And to do what?  To look through your binoculars  and take snapshots of our jail from every angle?

…We are closely monitoring your every move.  We know all about you, the cover of your bedside book and the brand of your toothpaste.  Every word you say is reported back to us, all the way to this watertight cell.

(more…)

In The Garden of Beasts — a Review

Thursday, December 29th, 2011

All who have read about, and certainly those who experienced, World War II and  Germany’s becoming  the vicious murderer of its own people, the invader of bordering countries and a threat to all of Europe, less than twenty years after its  defeat in WW I, have wondered: how did this happen, and could it have been stopped?   Similar questions have risen in recent years following the disastrous U.S. invasion of Iraq and the scarcely less happy one of Afghanistan, as Iran is seen by western nations to be be on the cusp of nuclear weapons capability:  should countries intervene in the affairs of others?  Ever?  If so, and if diplomatic and economic interventions fail, are military strikes ever the answer?

The question wanting to be answered is:  would power applied now bring less destruction and death than power applied later?  Does the case of Germany in the 1930s provide us with any wisdom regarding Iran, Serbia, Syria?

It is this question which led Erik Larson to William E. Dodd, U.S.  Ambassador to Germany from July 1933 to December 1937, and to his family, but particularly his 24-year-old daughter Martha.  What he found resulted in his 2011 book  In the Garden of Beasts: Love, Terror and an American Family in Hitler’s BerlinThough Larson shies away from calling this a history, in favor of a narrative non-fiction, the genre of his other books, it is a welcome addition to the mountain of research and writing, history and otherwise, about Hitler, the Nazis, the build up to WW II and what on-lookers, even players, were seeing and doing.   With Martha Dodd and her many, and scandalous, love affairs forming a major thread of the book, it may attract readers who would not open a standard book of history.  And in the process they will learn much. In fact, Tom Hanks has reportedly seen enough, of popular interest, to have purchased the movie rights.

Larson does a good job, as he tells us in his preface he wants to,  of helping us see Berlin in the summer, fall and winter of 1933 after the Dodd’s arrival in mid July.  By this time Hitler had been Chancellor for 6 months and lots of people knew things were going seriously wrong in Germany. (more…)

Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy– A Short Take

Thursday, December 29th, 2011

I was not alone in the crowds the other night exiting Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy wondering what it the heck we had missed.  The consensus was that you had to have read the novel to make head or tail of it.  Well, maybe we could make the tail out, but not the head.  The alternative was to think we were too dumb to pick up the cues, clues, asides, visuals and all else that a movie is supposed to supply.  And leaving an audience thinking it is too dumb to understand is not a sure way to cinematic success.

The essential problem I suppose is that John Le Carre novels are not simple whodunits. There are always enough traps within traps, false leads, red herrings and smoke and mirrors to keep your head spinning, even at a leisurely lets-read-that-again pace.  Packing this into a movie, with its own genre requirements for fast action and ratcheting tension, is a serious problem.  Not that it can’t  be done, but this one misses; the packing job isn’t up to the mark.

The film started out with the story being told before and under the titles.  Lots of stuff is happening, not much of it related.  As I hadn’t read the novel I hadn’t a clue as to who was appearing, one after the other, or what they meant to one another.   I didn’t get a sense of coherence until well into the movie when Smiley walks into his apartment and finds Ricki Tarr, another spook, with a tale to tell that sets the mystery straight, and the sleuthing begins.

I’m glad to have a Euro version of a major British spy novel, and with a Swedish director. On the whole I like the throttled back versions of thrillers I’ve seen from the continent; they depend less on buckets of blood than their American counterparts. ( Erik Skjoldbjaerg’s 1997 version of Insomnia was more to my taste than Chrisotpher Nolan’s 2002.)   In this case, though, I just didn’t get it.  Who was who; who was sleeping with whom, and why did it matter?  Was it a clue, or a diversion?  Who was Karla anyway?  What were the dark rooms with listening devices?  In fact, too often, I couldn’t figure out what time-frame we were in: the dark present, or the dark past.

I’ll admit I have a touch of prosopognosia: my facial recognition is not a strong as my wife’s, though it’s not all that bad.  But without some redundancy of signs, I was often at a loss.   I knew I’d seen fellow X but in what context, with whom, and doing what?  An accidental sighting of a passionate embrace at a Christmas party; no faces seen.  Smiley looks stricken.  Why?  Is it his wife?  How are we supposed to know?  And if so, what does it have to do with the plot?

It sort of ruined the thrill for me to keep feeling I was dumb.

I don’t know whether it was the screen play, the directing or production imposed cuts. Perhaps they were all so familiar with the story they couldn’t imagine what we innocents didn’t know.   I suspect the editing pared down the scenes too much, and juxtaposed too quickly.  A re-cut to set up the players a little more memorably, a few better cues as to whether a cut from one scene to the next  took us back into  a memory, or into another character’s scene same time-frame and a good tight thriller could be had.  The acting was very good; the set design great. Enjoyed the views of Budapest and Istanbul.  But who did what to whom?  What in the heck was the brought-back-from-the dead spy doing living in a trailer outside the school he was teaching at, and why on earth did he suddenly turn against the sad little kid he’d befriended?

I don’t mean you shouldn’t go.  Just bone up on the plot and characters before you do: IMDB, or focusfeatures, or  Wikipedia, or here

Then the puzzle pieces will be somewhat familiar and you’ll enjoy.

 

“Shame” – A Real Shame

Wednesday, December 21st, 2011

I’m going to save you $10 and two hours of your life right here.  The movie Shame, with deep pretense to be about a disabling affliction for thousands — of New Yorkers anyway– is a real shame.  Sex addiction.  Joyless sex addiction.  Joyless male sex addiction.  The doo-dad only works if affection is not involved: prostitutes, quicky pick-ups against a wall in a seedy neighborhood, anonymous male on male sex, sex with magazine exciters, sex over the internet.  But try a little tenderness and willie goes wonkers.  Man holds his head. Woman says it’s OK, but it’s not.  But he gets over it: calls a prostitute and scratches the itch.

Two hours to show us the problem. No solution. Last scene, bereft and broken sprawled in a deserted waterfront scene.  Sister in a pretty bad way, too.  Boss, also.  One bright light is a co-worker with whom he can’t do it.  Too bad…

And slow.  Long held shots showing the man staring out on the river.  Long shots, with portentious music during a get-over-it three-some.  It reminded me of the old porn movies which started out with a doctor’s admontion that sex could bring disease, and here was what to watch out for.  This was more, let’s say art-porn.  This is an art movie, not porn, so you aren’t going to go to hell for watching it.

The hell is in watching it.

Rotten Tomatoes gives it a 78% though all think it is grim grim grim…

A good film might be made of the subject, but this was not it.

The Girl in the Cafe — A Short Take

Saturday, December 17th, 2011

The Girl in the Cafe is one  of those wonderful, little-heard of films that you nearly click away from, the start is so slow, with such eye-averting awkwardness.  Then it picks up, the awkwardness smooths out, the painfully shy find a voice and it ends with a thrilling powerful speech. Gina, with a back story of her own, confronts the most powerful men in the world, speaking the core truth of her being — as it should be for all of us– nothing is more important than protecting a child.

As she snaps her finger every 3 seconds while she talks to them — the rate at which a child dies in the world– they, and we, are riveted; as if hearing this figure for the first time. Her delivery, without histrionics, is the delivery of the innocent: powerful, moving and damning.

 

David Yates, the director, better known for his Harry Potter movies, has set Bill Nighy, as Lawrence, and Kelly Macdonald, as Gina, in what seems at first to be a sweet-sad story of a May-December relationship.  And is Nighy a December!  He doesn’t have the rugged good looks of an older Eastwood, or DeNiro.  He just looks worn and washed out.  It turns out he’s a senior member of Britain’s Chancellor of the Exchequer.  On his way with his boss to Reykjavík for the G-8 summit, he screws up his courage and asks Gina, who he has met just days ago, at a cafe,  to go with him.

There are opportunities for a few chuckles as his colleagues realize he’s brought a date along, and opportunities for a few breath-taking views of Iceland’s landscape (of which there could have been more.)  But the tension is, or the double tension, will they share some coital moments in the only bed in the room, and will Gina’s reproofs of the G-8 ministers get her kicked off the island, and Lawrence fired — for bringing a “plant?”

As Kelly Macdonald says in the added features on the DVD, there doesn’t seem to be another film like this.  And why not?  It is engaging, sweet, probably inexpensive to make, and takes on enormous problems in the world without shifting into the anger of frustrated authoritarians who, while condemning the evil they see, really believe that they, given power, would be so much different.

If films like this were the environment the film-going public swam in, instead of the vengeful, blood-letting, smarter-than-the idiots films we have today, what great things might come about?

You won’t be unhappy at all with the 95 minutes spent in viewing, and you will want to run her speech several times.

  (more…)

THE DESPAIR OF TURBINES

Thursday, December 1st, 2011

 I remember a photo of Uncle Bill
beside a turbine.  He said he had
a wide smile on. I couldn’t see it
for the massive turbine
housing, shaft and collar.

He was so proud: as though he’d made it
in his backyard and discovered America again.
He showed me how he’d held the rivet gun
for seven thousand hours, four hundred
fifty-nine, he said, count ‘em,
putting his hands to mine and blasting away.
It was music to us then.
  (more…)

After the Sea Broke

Wednesday, November 23rd, 2011

After the sea broke
the lighthouse went cold
just when we needed it most–
a white light filling with blues.
The carbons grew shorter and
and the days rang around
like quoits of a terrible steel.

With the marsh grass so close    That’s when you mentioned
the effluent’s stench                  your love for me burned
the moon’s pity                         fell for another

The carbons burned lower,
the blues shifted down
no way to replace them
or push them together
hoping the last breath
or heart would ignite them.
The great light went out.
Two ships piled up on the shore.

W Kirkland

1979, Spain